My latest ramblings.
Enjoy! I definitely got important things to say
My latest ramblings.
Enjoy! I definitely got important things to say
Original article posted by Ed Newman at Medium
Whereas it’s true that magazine and newspaper publishing has taken a hit these past fifteen years, it would be wrongheaded to assume these forms of connecting with readers-–that is, consumers — would disappear altogether. In fact, a recent study indicates that print continues to be among the most effective media for reaching customers with your marketing messages.
A new study by the marketing analytics group Ebiquity, conducted in October 2017 and January 2018, has provided numerous insights to help businesses evaluate their marketing mix. One of the study’s aims was to not only determine the most effective marketing channels, but to discover how much the facts align with what agencies are telling (or selling to) their clients.
I don’t have space to tell you everything in this 34-page report except to say that when the facts are on the table, print is far from a dinosaur.
No carpenter builds a house with a hammer alone. The builder has saws, drills, wrenches, measuring devices, etc. Print is one tool in the toolbox.
The researchers began by establishing criteria as regards what is important when it comes to advertising. Targetability and Return On Investment (ROI) were ranked one and two as regards what matters most. Also important: triggering a positive emotional response, increasing brand salience (top of mind), and maximizing reach.
Judged against these criteria, television and radio scored highest in effectiveness. Print media — magazines and newspapers — also scored high, but are massively underrated. In contrast, online video and paid social media are overrated, the Ebiquity research shows. This is not to say that social media and digital has no value.
Eight Reasons To Reconsider Print
Here are just a few of the reasons print continues to have value.
30 years of experience has shown me that print is an effective way to grow many kinds of businesses. But, here’s the caveat. I’ve never believed that there’s only one way to market your goods or services. No carpenter builds a house with a hammer alone. The builder has saws, drills, wrenches, measuring devices, etc. Print is one tool in the toolbox, or as I prefer to say, one leg of a multi-legged table. And I admit it’s not always absolutely essential.
Look at Google, one of the largest companies in the world and hardly two decades old. They built a better search engine and cybercitizens literally beat a cyberpath to their page. I can’t recall ever seeing a print or television ad for this brand. Can you?
The Ebiquity report is simply a wake-up call for companies to re-evaluate their marketing mix. How much of what you’re doing is because everyone else is doing it, and how much is the result of your own applied critical thinking?
Al Ries and Laura Ries make a case in their 2002 bestseller The Fall of Advertising that brands are built by publicity, not advertising. They cite Starbucks, Wal-Mart, the Body Shop and Red Bull to make their case. They argue that because credibility is a crucial ingredient for brand building, and advertising lacks it, “only PR can supply that credibility.”
They cited Red Bull as an example of using PR to build the brand, but then what is Red Bull doing now? A couple years ago they began publishing a print magazine. Shell, an oil marketer, also started publishing a magazine, as have many other companies. Even J.C. Penney is back in the catalog printing biz. Is print really dead?
If one were to go back in time to those early days of the Internet one would find that I, like many others, had drunk the Kool-AidÒ. I believed what Michael Crichton said to the National Press Club in the mid-90s, that the Internet would kill television. For many years I was fond of citing Crichton, until the emergence of social media whereupon I quickly discovered that the biggest discussion themes trending on Twitter were generated by content from television. Celebrities, big sporting events, stupid reality shows — it’s all there on Twitter, Facebook and elsewhere.
Print publications are another media channel that was predicted to fall by the wayside. Kindle eBooks would purportedly smash the book publishing industry. Magazines would likewise become an endangered species. Or so they said. The reality is au contraire.
# # # #
(1) American Marketing Association, “Why Print Matters.”
(2) “Print Marketing Is Still Not Dead”
(3) CMO by Adobe: “Digital-First Content Marketing: The Return of Print!”
EdNote: This article originally appeared in my Marketing Matters column for Business North., a regional business publication serving the Northland.
Original article posted by Jessie Sampson at International News Media Association
Brands are missing out on £3 billion profit by underspending in news brands, according to Newsworks’ latest effectiveness research, Planning for Profit, conducted with Benchmarketing.
The study — a meta-analysis of 684 econometric models built between 2011 and 2017 — concentrates on profitability, the primary indicator of marketing success.
Encompassing news brands in both their print and digital forms, the work isolates news brands’ digital spend from general online display for the first time, allowing for an accurate assessment of the impact of context in the online environment.
As Philippa Brown, chief executive of Omnicom Media Group, says: “Digital news brands are often singled out for the brand safe online environment they provide advertisers, and rightly so. What’s so encouraging about this work is that it proves that these environments are also primed to deliver solid business returns for advertisers if utilised at the right level.”
Overall, the research highlights the huge profit advertisers are missing out on by not investing in news brands at optimum levels — £3 billion overall.
Looking at digital news brands, boosting investment would result in higher profit levels, up to as much as £300 million. Meanwhile, in print, increasing news brands’ share of budget to the optimum level would more than double current campaign profit return on investment (PROI).
To make the results of the work as widely applicable as possible, Benchmarketing developed five super-categories, such as “Everyday pickups” and “Shiny new things.” These cover 86% of the total UK advertising market and more than 90% of advertised brands.
In addition, there is also in-depth category analysis for four individual categories: supermarkets, finance, motors, and retail.
Take a look at some of the key findings for each:
Supermarkets: Profits could be increased by 60% if spend in print news brands was raised by a minimum of four and up to 11 percentage points. For digital news brands, allocating a 2.1% share of budget is recommended to optimise PROI.
Finance: Clients are missing out on £264 million potential profit by under-investing in print and digital news brands. For maximum profit return, the average recommendation for print news brands’ share is 11.9% of overall campaign spend (compared to the current 7.2%), while for digital news brands it stands at 5.6% (compared to the current 4.1%).
Motors: Clients are missing out on £56 million potential profit by under-investing in newbrands, particularly print. With a current average spend of 4% of overall media budgets, print news brands’ recommended minimum share is 6%.
Retail: Boosting print’s share of media spend to an average 21% of total campaign investment (from just under 14.4%) and digital news brands’ to 3.7% (from 1.7%) is Benchmarketing’s recommendation. Overall, the category is missing out on £1.34 billion potential profit.
The results of the category and super-category analysis have been fed into a PROI optimiser tool, allowing planners to see how much they should be investing in news brands for optimum returns. As a whole, the study provides clear evidence advertisers could be achieving much higher pay back from news brands if levels of investment were tweaked.
It also highlights the fact news brands deliver real, measurable business returns. As media commentator Brian Jacobs wrote of the research for Mediatel: “It’s refreshing to be reminded of the obvious fact that advertisers advertise in order to deliver results — particularly profit. This may come as a shock to those who seem to think advertising is doing its job by delivering huge and largely meaningless metrics from digital media forms, but the fact remains that it’s up to all of us to prove that advertising does in fact build business.
“And, that good advertising in the most appropriate environment works a lot better than bad advertising placed somewhere by someone, or more likely something, making choices based on the biggest numbers.”